Goliath toe to toe with HT
Goliath see that old HT has been pandering for votes again. Even Kissing "butt" for votes. TOo bad. ButGolilath remain competitive. HT OFFERING dates with HT or Pesty Flannigan in exchange for votes on HUGE POLL. SO, Goliath strike back with even more alluring offer as follows: For female viewers HT GOLIATH offers the same night on the town with either HT or Pesty PESTY version 2.0 (sometimes known as Billy) and John Wesley Hardin . Limo driven by Mrs. HT, SHEBA EL AL we'll have early cocktails at Mick's Lounge, then head down to the Lighthouse for Karaoke then cap the night off with dancing at Third Base. This offer includes a romantic horse drawn carriage ride down Riverside Dr to the Falls of the Ohio. and a fabulous breakfast at Jerry's. Only requirement for entrants vote for BatBlog GOLIATHAND WIMMENS in Goliath's Poll on GAW http://goliathandwimmens.blogspot.com/
PESTY VERSION 2.0
PESTY VERSION 2.0
JOHN WESLEY
HARDIN
Goliath's # 1 Lawyer
Deceased
Please note, Both Billy and John are deceased and therefore
somewhat stiff and quiet. Perhaps that's the kind of man you may be looking for.
They are a much better date than HT or PESTY FLANNIGAN!!
Vote for Goliath and find out!!!
Comments
I will, of course, expect certain, shall we say, "tribute" for my hard earned, and possibly game-changing contribution of, votes.
I guess really do have believe now that you were, indeed, ultimately defeated by...a kid...with a rock.
Tammy and Pammy speak directly to that male appendage, which in turn, overpowers(some, not all) male intellect. Therefore men who vote for HT, in my opinion, are thinking with that appendage, while men who vote for you, use their brains. Must give HT credit, he knows all about the weakness.
Yesterday's featured bedtime story illustrated the danger of divided streams of support . To avert this danger in the ongoing blog war, the KatoAnon Commentaries has dropped out of the blog poll featured on Goliath's blog and is instead endorsing the award-winning BatBlog produced by HoosierTaxpayer.
It has become evident Goliath's intent was to employ the TG Method of vote-getting by including so many blogs in his poll, the anti-Goliath vote would be split. We have evidence that strongly suggests this was his intent in declaring war on this site. Don't fall for it.
Stand firm beside the one chosen blog war warrior by voting for the BatBlog at this link http://goliathandwimmens.blogspot.com/. You might win one of the prize dates being offered by HoosierTaxpayer. However, our sources are recommending that any female or gay male winners of the date package consider donating it to charity and using it as a tax write-off.
If it stays at those numbers, just one vote switch would be all that's needed for either one of them to win.
Hmmm......
G 66.
BB 65.
AN 48.
With one day to go!
Close!
Time to roll with the absentee ballots!
Call out the C-ville Mafia!
And yet, you apparently read them and take the time to comment.
What kind of pathetic loser follows and comments on blogs they scornfully criticize as being lame?
It's a tough question, I know...but if you'll just take the time to look in a mirror you'll find the answer.
Next time you should consider trying for something a little more subtle and sophisticated...perhaps "nanny nanny boo boo," or, "I know you are, but what am I?"
Come on...you can do it...I have faith in you.
Too bad I didn't use the word imbecile anywhere else today. You probably would have been able to spell that correctly, as well.
But, nonetheless, this is genuine progress - miniscule, but definitely progress. Good for you!
WINNING.
To be fair, though, I did make reference to "castaways" from her now-defunct forum, but that could mean any one of her many former readers and comment posters, couldn't it? Unless, of course…she really WAS actually the only...oh, my. I'm sure you didn't mean to imply anything of the sort, did you?
As far as winning, our friend Goliath is the winner here. Interesting and spirited back-and-forth in the comments makes for a more interesting blog, which, in turn, attracts even more readers, as I’m sure AN herself would tell you…if she was here, that is…which, of course, she’s not…because with her repeated insistence that people should not be “cowards” and should identify themselves in order to “own” what they say, I’m SURE she’d never go around making insulting and inflammatory statements under the cowardly cover of “anonymous,” don’t you agree?
It sure seems that you are commenting here as much as I am. Are you, then, implying that you, as well, are spending a little too (sic) much time responding to me?